home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Light ROM 4
/
Light ROM 4 - Disc 1.iso
/
text
/
maillist
/
1995
/
1095.doc
/
000882_owner-lightwav…mail.webcom.com_Mon Oct 16 03:53:19 1995.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1995-11-07
|
2KB
Received: by mail.webcom.com
(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA259340799; Mon, 16 Oct 1995 03:53:19 -0700
Return-Path: <owner-lightwave@mail.webcom.com>
Received: from mail.infinet.com by mail.webcom.com with SMTP
(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA259280795; Mon, 16 Oct 1995 03:53:15 -0700
Received: by mail.infinet.com (Smail3.1.28.1 #9)
id m0t4mzK-000K9VC; Mon, 16 Oct 95 06:41 EDT
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 1995 06:41:46 -0400 (EDT)
From: "J. David Johnson" <jdavid@infinet.com>
X-Sender: jdavid@rigel
To: lightwave@mail.webcom.com
Subject: Re: AC, Joe, and Manny: Thanks RE: Rendering
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSD/.3.91.951016001055.22181B-100000@shell.monmouth.com>
Message-Id: <Pine.SUN.3.91.951016064009.17349B-100000@rigel>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-lightwave@mail.webcom.com
Precedence: bulk
On Sun, 15 Oct 1995, Robert Cohen wrote:
> I remember hearing that in one of the Stranahan tapes also, but the fact
> of the matter is, whenever I use field rendering, I experience nearly
> twice the rendering time. So... my question is, how do you employ field
> rendering without adding substantially to the rendering times ??
>
Simple. Just render out your anim at step 2... ;)
J. David - Video GT
--
"J. David Johnson" <jdavid@infinet.com> sent this message.
To Post a Message : lightwave@webcom.com
Un/Subscription Requests To : lightwave-request@webcom.com
(DIGEST) or : lightwave-digest-request@webcom.com
Administrative Items To : owner-lightwave@webcom.com